<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Republican Club Of Saint Augustine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saint-augustine-gop-republicans.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saint-augustine-gop-republicans.com</link>
	<description>Liberty, Prosperity And Principle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:27:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama pledges to boost U.S. exports</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departments of agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export import bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thursday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

President Obama on Thursday ordered an all-out effort by the U.S. government to increase exports to create more jobs amid record-high unemployment. "This morning, I signed an executive order instructing the federal government to use every available federal resource in support of that mission," the president told the roughly 1,200 people attending the Export-Import Bank's annual conference in Washington. As part of the president's initiative, he also has created the Export Promotion Cabinet, which will include officials from the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Labor and State to execute his plan to double U.S. exports in five years. Mr. Obama said ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411054/090d3bca39/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Obama pledges to boost U.S. exports&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

President Obama on Thursday ordered an all-out effort by the U.S. government to increase exports to create more jobs amid record-high unemployment. "This morning, I signed an executive order instructing the federal government to use every available federal resource in support of that mission," the president told the roughly 1,200 people attending the Export-Import Bank's annual conference in Washington. As part of the president's initiative, he also has created the Export Promotion Cabinet, which will include officials from the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Labor and State to execute his plan to double U.S. exports in five years. Mr. Obama said ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411054/090d3bca39/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Obama%20pledges%20to%20boost%20U.S.%20exports&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/obama-pledges-boost-us-exports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House leaders call pro-life group&#8217;s bluff</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Bart Stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

A top House Democrat said Thursday that leaders may not have to change the Senate health care bill's abortion-related provisions to meet the demands of 12 members who have threatened to walk. Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Michigan Democrat, has said he and 11 other Democrats who voted for the House bill will oppose the Senate bill unless strong abortion restrictions are added. Coming up with the 216 votes required for passage of the bill would be difficult without those 12, who Mr. Stupak said believe the bill allows for federal funding of abortions. The issue stalled a vote in ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411051/176172cd17/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=House leaders call pro-life group&#39;s bluff&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

A top House Democrat said Thursday that leaders may not have to change the Senate health care bill's abortion-related provisions to meet the demands of 12 members who have threatened to walk. Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Michigan Democrat, has said he and 11 other Democrats who voted for the House bill will oppose the Senate bill unless strong abortion restrictions are added. Coming up with the 216 votes required for passage of the bill would be difficult without those 12, who Mr. Stupak said believe the bill allows for federal funding of abortions. The issue stalled a vote in ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411051/176172cd17/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=House%20leaders%20call%20pro-life%20group&#39;s%20bluff&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-leaders-call-pro-life-groups-bluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP bans earmarks for members</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john a boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leader John A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[move]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork barrel spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thursday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

In a move to break with Republicans' big-spending past, House Republicans voted Thursday to ban their members this year from requesting earmarks, or pork-barrel spending projects. House Republicans, who passed the moratorium by voice vote in a closed-door meeting, said they have now put pressure on the rest of Congress -- Republicans in the Senate, and Democrats in both chambers -- to follow their lead. "Today, House Republicans took an important step toward showing the American people were serious about reform by adopting an immediate, unilateral ban on all earmarks," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican. "But ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411046/fb8547cee8/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=House GOP bans earmarks for members&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

In a move to break with Republicans' big-spending past, House Republicans voted Thursday to ban their members this year from requesting earmarks, or pork-barrel spending projects. House Republicans, who passed the moratorium by voice vote in a closed-door meeting, said they have now put pressure on the rest of Congress -- Republicans in the Senate, and Democrats in both chambers -- to follow their lead. "Today, House Republicans took an important step toward showing the American people were serious about reform by adopting an immediate, unilateral ban on all earmarks," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican. "But ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411046/fb8547cee8/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=House%20GOP%20bans%20earmarks%20for%20members&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-gop-bans-earmarks-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public unmoved by Obama&#8217;s health bill PR</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impassioned speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Knoller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter discontent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

For all of President Obama's impassioned speeches trying to sell his health care reform plan to Americans, opposition to the $2 trillion proposal has remained nearly unchanged for months, stretching back to last summer, when town halls across the nation flared with voter discontent. Mr. Obama has been lobbying Americans on his reform bill for just more than a year, beginning on March 5, 2009, at the opening session of the Forum on Health Reform, according to CBS Radio's Mark Knoller, who keeps scrupulous records on the president's daily events. Since then, Mr. Obama has delivered 52 speeches, statements and ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411045/02dd74a923/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Public unmoved by Obama&#39;s health bill PR &#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

For all of President Obama's impassioned speeches trying to sell his health care reform plan to Americans, opposition to the $2 trillion proposal has remained nearly unchanged for months, stretching back to last summer, when town halls across the nation flared with voter discontent. Mr. Obama has been lobbying Americans on his reform bill for just more than a year, beginning on March 5, 2009, at the opening session of the Forum on Health Reform, according to CBS Radio's Mark Knoller, who keeps scrupulous records on the president's daily events. Since then, Mr. Obama has delivered 52 speeches, statements and ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411045/02dd74a923/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Public%20unmoved%20by%20Obama&#39;s%20health%20bill%20PR%20&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/public-unmoved-obamas-health-bill-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rove: We mishandled Katrina recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[african american mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President George W]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president george w bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The Bush administration mishandled the rescue effort after Hurricane Katrina, said Karl Rove, the top adviser to former President George W. Bush. Mr. Rove, 59, said the administration should have used a 1807 law that gives the federal government authority to take control of an insurgent U.S. state. "It was a mistake," Mr. Rove said Thursday in discussing his recent memoir on The Washington Times' "America's Morning News" radio show. "We should have used the legal authority to declare the state an insurgent, taken the political heat of pushing out the state's governor and overruling the African-American mayor of New ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411036/6d885fd77d/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Rove: We mishandled Katrina recovery&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

The Bush administration mishandled the rescue effort after Hurricane Katrina, said Karl Rove, the top adviser to former President George W. Bush. Mr. Rove, 59, said the administration should have used a 1807 law that gives the federal government authority to take control of an insurgent U.S. state. "It was a mistake," Mr. Rove said Thursday in discussing his recent memoir on The Washington Times' "America's Morning News" radio show. "We should have used the legal authority to declare the state an insurgent, taken the political heat of pushing out the state's governor and overruling the African-American mayor of New ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411036/6d885fd77d/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Rove:%20We%20mishandled%20Katrina%20recovery&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/rove-bush-wh-mishandled-katrina-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dodd offers his own finance regulation bill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ASSOCIATED PRESS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob corker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman Christopher Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consensus bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Bob Corker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate banking committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Unable to muster bipartisan agreement on key banking provisions, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said Thursday he will offer his own version of a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations without Republican support. A month of talks between Dodd and Republican Sen. Bob Corker found some common ground but failed to yield agreement on consumer protections and other sticking points. "Together we have made significant progress and resolved many of the items, but a few outstanding issues remain," Dodd said in a statement. Dodd said he still aimed to get a consensus bill, but said time was ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411035/e89fbed2ae/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Dodd offers his own finance regulation bill &#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Unable to muster bipartisan agreement on key banking provisions, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said Thursday he will offer his own version of a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations without Republican support. A month of talks between Dodd and Republican Sen. Bob Corker found some common ground but failed to yield agreement on consumer protections and other sticking points. "Together we have made significant progress and resolved many of the items, but a few outstanding issues remain," Dodd said in a statement. Dodd said he still aimed to get a consensus bill, but said time was ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411035/e89fbed2ae/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Dodd%20offers%20his%20own%20finance%20regulation%20bill%20&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/dodd-offer-his-own-financial-regulation-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both parties in House start war over pork</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john a boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leader John A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moratorium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork barrel spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wednesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Pork-barrel spending may be on its last legs in the House as Republicans and Democrats join in a bidding war to outdo each other over fighting abusive earmark spending. House Democrats, who control the chamber, said Wednesday they'll impose a ban on earmarks where the government sends money to for-profit corporations, while House Republicans are slated to vote Thursday on whether to impose a complete one-year moratorium on themselves - and increase pressure on Democrats to follow suit. House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, told his colleagues in a closed-door meeting Wednesday that the moratorium vote will test ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411014/568a474189/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Both parties in House start war over pork&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

Pork-barrel spending may be on its last legs in the House as Republicans and Democrats join in a bidding war to outdo each other over fighting abusive earmark spending. House Democrats, who control the chamber, said Wednesday they'll impose a ban on earmarks where the government sends money to for-profit corporations, while House Republicans are slated to vote Thursday on whether to impose a complete one-year moratorium on themselves - and increase pressure on Democrats to follow suit. House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, told his colleagues in a closed-door meeting Wednesday that the moratorium vote will test ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411014/568a474189/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Both%20parties%20in%20House%20start%20war%20over%20pork&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/both-parties-in-house-start-war-over-pork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#8217;s union transparency rules retracted under Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial disclosure statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stringent regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The Obama administration promised increased transparency in government but has rolled back rules proposed by the Bush administration that expanded the financial disclosure statements required of labor unions and their leaders. Since President Obama took office, the Labor Department has rescinded or delayed three sets of rules proposed by the George W. Bush administration that would have required unions and their leaders to more specifically detail their finances, according to a review of records by The Washington Times. The rules were rolled back while the Obama administration was seeking more stringent regulation of corporate America, including banks, insurance companies, health ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411022/8ce4f96960/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Bush&#39;s union transparency rules retracted under Obama&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

The Obama administration promised increased transparency in government but has rolled back rules proposed by the Bush administration that expanded the financial disclosure statements required of labor unions and their leaders. Since President Obama took office, the Labor Department has rescinded or delayed three sets of rules proposed by the George W. Bush administration that would have required unions and their leaders to more specifically detail their finances, according to a review of records by The Washington Times. The rules were rolled back while the Obama administration was seeking more stringent regulation of corporate America, including banks, insurance companies, health ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411022/8ce4f96960/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Bush&#39;s%20union%20transparency%20rules%20retracted%20under%20Obama&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/bushs-union-transparency-rules-retracted-under-oba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House KOs call for speedy Afghanistan withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troubled nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdrawal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

In an overwhelming show of bipartisan support for President Obama's troop surge in Afghanistan, the House on Wednesday soundly defeated a resolution setting a timetable for withdrawal. The vote, which marked the first time the House has had a full debate on Afghanistan since Mr. Obama announced his surge last year, unleashed years of pent-up frustration from liberal Democrats and a few conservative Republicans angry over the direction the 9-year-old conflict has taken. But the 356-65 vote against withdrawal was a dominant endorsement to give Mr. Obama the time he's asked for to stabilize the troubled nation. "Have we forgotten? ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411020/9671540dff/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=House KOs call for speedy Afghanistan withdrawal&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

In an overwhelming show of bipartisan support for President Obama's troop surge in Afghanistan, the House on Wednesday soundly defeated a resolution setting a timetable for withdrawal. The vote, which marked the first time the House has had a full debate on Afghanistan since Mr. Obama announced his surge last year, unleashed years of pent-up frustration from liberal Democrats and a few conservative Republicans angry over the direction the 9-year-old conflict has taken. But the 356-65 vote against withdrawal was a dominant endorsement to give Mr. Obama the time he's asked for to stabilize the troubled nation. "Have we forgotten? ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411020/9671540dff/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=House%20KOs%20call%20for%20speedy%20Afghanistan%20withdrawal&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/house-kos-call-for-speedy-afghan-troop-withdrawal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief justice reignites feud with Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice John G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan the flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john g roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of the union address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The simmering feud between the White House and the Supreme Court is getting a little hotter - and lawmakers on Capitol Hill are helping fan the flames. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.'s impromptu portrayal Tuesday of President Obama's attacks on the high court during the State of the Union address as "very troubling" drew a brusque retort from the White House, which called the court's campaign finance ruling the real problem, and from Democrats eager to attack the court. Responding to a law student's question when speaking at the University of Alabama, Chief Justice Roberts took aim at Mr. ...
<p>
	<a href="/mailfriend/79/411016/caa1f7c26f/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&#38;title=Chief justice reignites feud with Obama&#38;url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share">
	&#60;/a
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

The simmering feud between the White House and the Supreme Court is getting a little hotter - and lawmakers on Capitol Hill are helping fan the flames. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.'s impromptu portrayal Tuesday of President Obama's attacks on the high court during the State of the Union address as "very troubling" drew a brusque retort from the White House, which called the court's campaign finance ruling the real problem, and from Democrats eager to attack the court. Responding to a law student's question when speaking at the University of Alabama, Chief Justice Roberts took aim at Mr. ...
<p>
	<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/411016/caa1f7c26f/">Email</a>
	<a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=20&title=Chief%20justice%20reignites%20feud%20with%20Obama&url=http://washingtontimes.com//news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/">
		<img src="http://s7.addthis.com/static/btn/sm-share-en.gif" width="83" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/>
	</a
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/11/chief-justice-reignites-feud-with-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
